This informative essay explains some
facts about Conflict Diamonds, also known as blood diamonds. Its flow in the
diamond market and its affect on the consumer is also discussed. “To discuss
what are conflict diamonds; its flow in the market and its affect on the
consumer is analyzed.”
Conflict diamonds are also known as
blood diamonds, war diamonds or hot diamonds. These are the diamonds, which are
mined from war zone. United Nations defines conflict diamonds as
"...diamonds that originate from areas controlled by forces opposed to
recognize government….and are used to fund military action in opposition to
those government.” It is normally in rough form.
Conflict diamonds were brought to attention in
the early 1990’s. Conflict diamonds played a role in the Africa’s civil war. In
these wars, innocent people and hundreds of men and women are caught up and
treated as slaves to extract diamonds illegally. These diamonds were then
smuggled and sold by the rebels to war against the government. In the civil war
of Africa thousands of people died by the rebels. These rebels got funds from
these diamonds. Conflict diamonds were sold to finance the war with the government
officials. It can be said that these diamonds are used as fuels. Rebels and
militants also fight for these diamond territories. Several lives are lost in
this too. Innocent people are abused to make them extract diamonds for the war.
Killings, beatings, torture, child labor, forced labor and many other ways are
used to abuse the people. In republic of Congo alone 1,500 people are killed
during a civil war. This blood bath is fueled by these diamonds. Human life is
very much affected by these diamonds. A report has said that much of this is
still happening in some parts of Africa. "The government in Congo has no
idea where 40% of its diamonds come from - they could be coming from Angola or
Zimbabwe or even from Mars," Mr Smilie says. These are the conflict diamonds,
which are mined illegally.
Kimberley Process was introduced to
stem the flow of conflict diamonds into diamond market. It was founded to make
sure that the trade of blood diamonds is prevented from the customers. From
this process, blood diamonds are identified. This process ensures that all the
rough diamonds are certified and then sold or exported in the market by
legitimate reasons. The member countries under this process make sure that
their shipment of rough diamond is certified as ‘conflict-free’. Each shipment
carries that where the diamond has came from and how it has been extracted. It
also includes that how the diamond is cut and how it has been polished. All the
ways should be legitimate to get the Kimberly Process certificate. One should
pass national legislation upon import/export control system for conflict
diamonds. The aim of this process is to block the sales of blood diamonds. If
this process is properly ensured it will made life harder for criminals. Its
weakness is that the government officials are easily bribed to get the
Kimberley Process certificate. One can bribe any one by his money to smuggle
the blood diamonds. In my opinion if every member under this process works
loyally and efficiently this process will work. This process has failed due to
the corrupt nature of government officials. Chairman Gooch of Global Witness
said, “Nearly nine years after the process was launched, the sad truth is that
most consumers still cannot be sure where their diamonds came from.” The first member to leave the program of
Kimberley Process is the group of Global Witness. Gooch also said, “The scheme
failed all three big tests”. Their team accuses Zimbabwean government that
their army has been involved in human rights abuses in the diamond mining
areas. Their view is that the Kimberley Process does not accept this reality
and that consumer should stop buying gems from Marange Fields and the industry
should stop supplying these diamonds. They were okay with the process but when
the team of Global Witness heard reports of human abuses by government forces,
they withdraw themselves from Kimberley Process. Each diamond industry should
demonstrate that the diamonds they sell are not fuelling abuses.
It is being observed that with the failure of
Kimberley Process there is full possibility that the trade of conflict diamonds
will revive. It is a serious threat as many people have already suffered from
this illegal trade and if it will not be blocked it will create a serious
threat to the human life. Illegitimate trade of blood diamonds are a reason for
many civil wars. The war between the rebels and the government officials causes
threat to human life. Also in the extraction of these diamonds thousands of
men, women and children are abused. A consumer has the power to get knowledge of what he is
buying. One should get details about the diamonds he is buying. Demanding proof
that a diamond is conflict-free gives a message to the world that nobody will
support an industry or nation that helps fund terror groups. Change will not
happen overnight but if everyone remains persistent in keeping the diamond
trade conflict free, this change will surely occur. As it is the right of every
customer to get a conflict-free diamond it is his duty, that he is aware of the
details, like where the diamond came from, how is it cut and how it is being
polished. This will create awareness among the people as well as the retailers.
This will make the retailers to be careful not to take blood diamonds.
The future of conflict diamonds is
not confirmed. But it can be said that if people work honestly under the scheme
known as Kimberley Process blood diamonds will become extinct and a
conflict-free trade will be established. To ensure the outcome of this process
everyone should play their role to stop the illegitimate and illegal trade of
blood diamonds.
Conclusion:
From
the above discussion it can be concluded that conflict or blood diamonds are used
as fuels in the civil wars; it causes serious threat to human life. The
Kimberley Process founded to block the trade of blood diamonds was a beneficial
move but due to the corrupt nature of many people, it is failed.
Works Cited
1. John Eligon. Global
Witness Quits Group on Blood Diamonds, 5 Dec, 2011 retrieved
from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/world/africa/global-witness-quits-group-on-blood-diamonds.html?_r=0
2. James Melik. Diamonds: Does the Kimberley
Process Work? ,28 June,
2010 retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10307046
3 Paul Armstrong. How Diamonds
Fuel Africa's Conflicts, 16 May, 2012 retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/26/world/africa/blood-diamonds/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment